Form submitted successfully, thank you.

Error submitting form, please try again.

Getting Beyond “Line-of-Sight” for Nikon’s Creative Lighting System

A couple posts ago I mentioned why I like to use speedlights to enhance or overpower the ambient light to get a certain mood or create specific light for my subjects. I personally like to use Nikon’s Creative Lighting System, or CLS, since it gives me some advantages over using a manual flash. CLS works very well when there is a close proximity between the master signal flash, and the remote flash; however, sometimes with more complex lighting assignments the master and remote flashes can’t physically “see” each other (i.e., like when placing the remote flash in a separate room to simulate a fill light and the master flash signal doesn’t actually reach the remote.)

The remote flash depends on seeing the master speedlight’s “pre-flash signal” for it to trigger, so sometimes CLS may fall a bit short in some circumstances. The Nikon flashes (SB-800 and SB-600) have a small window located on the side of the flash as the remote light sensor. If the remote flash doesn’t see this signal, its flash will not be triggered with CLS. In order to be certain that your remote flash will trigger in these cases, you need to use another device. That’s where my trusted radio PocketWizards come in to play.

The PocketWizards are great devices and since they are radio triggers, they have a superior range over the standard “light” triggers that come with the SB-800/600. This also means that you don’t need to have a “line-of-sight” for the master and remote speedlights to work properly. With PocketWizards, I set the remote flashes manually to a specific ratio (i.e., 1/8, 1/16, etc.) and generally base the ratio on a few test shots and then go from there. Here is an example of using the PocketWizards.

PocketWizard Off-Camera Flash

Image #1 | PocketWizard Off-Camera Flash

The great thing about using an off-camera flash is that it produces wonderful highlights that you cannot get with a camera mounted flash. You can see the edge detail in the bride’s hair, and also the shadows that are visible makes the image appear more three-dimensional compared to a standard on-camera flash unit. When shooting in an indoor location (like the reception photo above) where the exposure value (EV) doesn’t change, using a manual flash does not have too many issues. However, it’s when you are moving around to different locations is when manual flash can have some drawbacks, and if you have any “line-of-sight” issues then CLS is no longer a solid alternative.

Unfortunately, there has not been a solution for these issues until this year. The recent development is called the RadioPopper (I will go over this device in another post), developed by a professional photographer. This is a great flash addition for those of us who use proprietary flash systems like CLS and want to have a longer-range radio trigger. There are great benefits to this new technology, 1. it works just like CLS – all of your controls are exactly the same, 2. you can use specialty features of your flash/camera like FP or high-speed sync which is great for using flash in high ambient light and being able to control the depth-of-field with a wide-aperture, and finally, 3. the ability to go beyond line-of-sight and high-background light to ensure you get a positive trigger from your master flash. The transceiver essentially captures the pre-flash signal from your master speedlight then transmits that same signal via radio to the receiver on the remote. Ingenious, and really a leap forward for those of use who use flash.

The following image was shot in the evening in San Francisco where the bride and groom would normally only be lit by ambient light. I used the RadioPoppers for this shot. The light was positioned off to the camera left, and used to provide a direct light onto the subjects. We shot all around the city that night, and it was great to be able to make adjustments to the remote flash (SB-800) directly from the master flash (SB-800) located on top of my camera (Nikon D300) instead of having to run over to it and make manual adjustments. Although this is a new technology (and there were some misfires) it did perform well.

Using the new RadioPoppers for Off-Camera Flash

Image #2 | Using the new RadioPoppers for Off-Camera Flash

You can see that I was able to get a great directed light to use to highlight the subjects. Since we were constantly moving it was nice to have all of the control at my fingertips and to not miss a specific moment. I’m very pleased with the image.

In the near future I will create another post with more specifics regarding the RadioPoppers. Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the comment area. Thanks for dropping by.

August 28, 2008 - 8:02 am dtorrey - Michael, I just noticed the background on this one...FANTASTIC. Next time we talk, you'l have to give me some hints on how you did it. Peace, Dave Torrey

August 28, 2008 - 11:59 am Michael - @dtorrey - Hey Dave, thanks for dropping by the blog. This shot was shot in the evening, so there was very little ambient light. I used two flashes. One was on a light-stick and held about 12~13 ft. above the couple. The other flash was on-camera and diffused to a lower EV value. I used the RadioPoppers to set and trigger these flashes. The background is from a HUGE advertisement that was set right by Union Square in the shopping area of downtown San Francisco.

September 2, 2010 - 1:58 am Rik Pennington - Came across your site while researching wireless trigger systems for my SB 800 set up. Need to get my flash off camera to create some more dynamic images and find your use of flash inspiring. A couple of questions, do you fire your flash bare bulb directly or are you shooting through umbrellas/diffusers, particularly in regards to the portrait in Union SQ? And secondly, do the Radio Poppers completely replace the Pocketwizards? Cheers Rik

September 2, 2010 - 12:03 pm Michael - Hi Rik, Thanks for your comment. Well, your comment about RadioPoppers being a direct replacement for the Pocket Wizards wasn't really true back when those photos were shot; however, they are getting better and may be a replacement now. I still love to use my Pocket Wizards though and I was selected by Pocket Wizard for use in their advertising. They are trustworthy so I know that they will work when I use them. The shot in Union Square was shot bare bulb but I did use some snoots for some other shots. When working outside I found no use for a diffuser. I hope this helps some, and feel free to leave another message or you can contact me via email for more discussion. Take care, and good luck with your business. - Michael

Your email is never published or shared.